Hi all,
No misprint. If you look at the definitions on p.13 of
"optional_line_value" and "optional_xref_ID" the delimiter is
included there in each case. The document is quite correct, this is
how grammars are defined.
Otherwise the delimiter would be required before and/or after the tag
even if there was no optional field.
/mike
On 3 Aug 2011, at 06:54, Mikkel Eide Eriksen wrote:
Hi Ron,
That indeed looks like a typo. In fact, two "delim"s are missing,
and their presence should be dictated by the optional value/xref.
It should be like this, based on how files look:
level + [delim + optional_xref_ID] + delim + tag + [delim +
optional_line_value] + terminator
Regards,
Mikkel
On 03/08/2011, at 06.46, Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Folks
In this doc http://wiki.webtrees.net/images/Ged551-5.pdf about 1/2
way
down p 11 we see:
level + delim + [optional_xref_ID] + tag + [optional_line_value] +
terminator
I assume this is a misprint for:
level + delim + [optional_xref_ID] + tag + delim +
[optional_line_value]
+ terminator
since otherwise a tag of INDI say could abut a line item of IIIIII.
Or am I missing something?
--
Ron Savage
http://savage.net.au/
Ph: 0421 920 622
