At 07:54 PM 7/22/02 +0100, Ray Hilton wrote: >Don't suppose you know how to get the name of a function represented by >a reference? It would make things clean in my head :)
Eh. No. Maybe with some esoteric operator overloading logic. Is the reference to an anonymous sub? I guess not, just checking. If not, just use the name of the subroutine instead of the reference. Make use you apply the "no strict 'refs';" at the right places if your using "use strict;" (well, if you don't, you should ;-) Liz
