Quoting David Mertens (dcmertens.p...@gmail.com): > Would it be possible to use the "forks" module? It is supposed to provide a > drop-in replacement for "threads" on operating systems that support posix > forks, which would be true in your case. I suspect this would cure your > problems, since everything would operate using forks instead of mixing > forks and threads.
I "need" the threads because this brings me ':shared' scalars/hashes. I thought of doing this only with fork() but i'd need to create some kind of inter-process-communication thingie to get the results back, which isn't impossible, just requires me to rewrite a large part of my code. ;) And i still don't understand why mixing threads+fork is "not smart". ;) -Sndr. -- | The short fortune teller who escaped from prison: a small medium at large. | 4096R/20CC6CD2 - 6D40 1A20 B9AA 87D4 84C7 FBD6 F3A9 9442 20CC 6CD2
