On 29/6/03 6:37 pm, Peter Marschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sunday 29 June 2003 18:50, Chris Ridd wrote: >> I just did a cvs update and it found the two changes, though using >> SourceForge's Web CVS browser it couldn't find the changes. It looks like >> SF's viewcvs script is broken. > > I should have read the whole page in SF's ViewCVS: > At the botton of each page tere's a note saying that ViewCVS is > running against the backup CVS server, and thus the data shown may be > 24 hours old. > > Since Kartik's mail is from Wednesday the cahnges should appear. > > But it's not only the ViewCVS script that is affected by the problem. > Even if I login annoymously and check out a copy from the CVS tree > I only get an outdated version compared to the 0.29 release > (LDAP.pm pretends the version is "0.28_01" ;-( > > Peter
I guess doing an authenticated cvs update needs to use the "real" CVS server (so changes can be applied) whereas an anonymous update (and the ViewCVS script) can simply use a read-only copy. It does look like the read-only copy is rather more that 24 hours old :-(( Cheers, Chris
