On 15/1/06 1:46, Peter Marschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Saturday, 14. January 2006 18:10, Chris Ridd wrote: >> On 14/1/06 2:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> And in the same fashion, what to do with approx matches as 2252 does not >>> specify a declaration of approx filters ? >> >> Anything you like. >> >> Most implementations use something like Soundex, though this works pretty >> badly unless the values are English. Actually even with English the results >> aren't often that good. Maybe something more perl-ish would be interesting > > Regexes ? ;-))
That's a good idea :-) Cheers, Chris
