Folks,
Shouldn't have hit send so quickly. A couple more things of interest in
comparing the dump routines of Convert::ASN1 and Convert::BER. I
realize these are for *debug only*, per the source, but ...
In Convert::BER->dump(), I think that most of the addresses of the
contents of "complicated" dumped objects are "off", pointing at the
length octet(s).
In both routines, however, the handling of this INTEGER is suspect:
0085 02 16: INTEGER = 1766191625
0097 : }
0097 30 13: SEQUENCE {
0099 06 9: OBJECT ID = 1.2.840.113549.1.1.1
00A4 05 0: NULL
00A6 : }
Where the raw octets were:
0080 6E 67 20 43 41 02 10 69 45 F2 09 14 55 10 D8 7F ng CA..iE...U...
0090 2C A2 97 D0 DD 65 CF 30 0D 06 09 2A 86 48 86 F7 ,....e.0...*.H..
Here is the "openssl asn1parse" view of the same area (offsets in
decimal...):
133:d=6 hl=2 l= 16 prim: INTEGER
:6945F209145510D87F2CA297D0DD65CF
151:d=5 hl=2 l= 13 cons: SEQUENCE
153:d=6 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :rsaEncryption
Thanks again,
rnd
