On 13/3/06 5:36, Diffenderfer, Randy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are a couple differences, some cosmetic, some not so... The > inclusion of the 'tag' primitive in the BER output I like, for instance.
Agreed. > I'm not sure which is more apprpriated for the context tags. I guess dumping the outer-most one makes at least some sense, because it would correspond with the byte offset column. > But the "huh" is in the address of the STRING contents. Here I think > ASN1 has gotten it right. The "A4" octet is at offset 00A9 in the > object, not at 00A7 (which is the length value) as depicted in BER. > > I think it would be a good thing to have these guys consistent, and I do > think the BER string contents' offset isn't kosher. Yes, though I'm not sure if Graham's updating the BER module much. I thought nowadays the ASN module's where it is at :-) Cheers, Chris
