On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 07:27:34 +0000 Chris Ridd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I simplified it slightly, and revision 542 contains this change: > > [patch elided] > > Can you check that still fixes your problem? What you did is actually what I was more initially inclined to do, but there seemed to be an impulse towards a single-exit-point style so I went with that. Dijkstra style, I guess you could call it. :) Anyway, yes, your version works great. Thanks, Chris. Mike.
