Back away from the keyboard, do not touch a thing :-) Graham.
On Dec 11, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Mathieu Parent wrote: > I'm going to be crazy.. > > Now this works. I have not changed anything! > > In the meantime, I have added support for LDAP intermediate response > in Wireshark. > > Mathieu Parent > > > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Mathieu Parent <math.par...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Mathieu Parent <math.par...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> A little more info. >>> >>> The attached capture reproduce the following scenario: >>> 192.168.0.132 is the Net::LDAP test machine >>> 192.168.0.15 is the master >>> 192.168.0.16 is the slave >>> >>> at 0 the slave slapd is started >>> at 6 the test script is launched >>> at 14 a new user is added >>> >>> We can see that on 14, only the slave is notified. >>> >>> NB: the user is added using a web interface hosted on the master. This >>> stream is not captured. >> >> To ease the analyse, I have added a dissector for rfc4533 in >> wireshark. It is here: >> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4309 >> >> But I still don't understand the problem. This will probably be easier >> while not being sick ;) >> >> Mathieu Parent >> >
