Thanks for your time. The lack of response to "purity vs real-world usability" is disappointing. >> I'm dealing with 1G+ LDIFs, and the patch *is* cleaner for me, but
>> preprocessing will work. >When the dump utility is capable of writing to stdout, you can use a pipe. >This way you will not need more memory, ... correct, will not need disk. *will* more CPU, more time. >> If I put the bug report in, will you incorporate the patch? :) >No. [I do not want perl-ldap to look like the easier target ;-]] purity wins over pragmatism :) >If they do, you can throw away the preprocessor step. I won't have a preprocessor. I have a patched Net::LDAP::LDIF! thanks to the maintainers for making it easy to patch. If anyone is in the same situation as I, you have my permission to use the patch in my original posting.
