On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 01:21:33PM -0500, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 01:12:46PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > with sugar on top?
> > </carrot>
> >
> > <stick>
> > or i will beat you with a large clue bat
> > </stick>
>
> OK, shall I call it 'data'?
Still I really don't see the advantage. If you think it through, 'data'
has the same problems as storing stuff in the hash. Can 'data' easily be
augmented by sub-classes?
--
"Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity."
via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank
