On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 02:12:51PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 08:46:16AM -0500, Joshua Pritikin wrote:
> > Nick, are you satisfied with Uri's comments? We *can* change Event if
> > folks feel strongly about it. It's not too troublesome to add this to
> > my codes:
>
> I don't think it would be too much of an issue if the require was removed
> from the AUTOLOAD.
>
> You could consider adding an Event::Type package (ala Tk::widget)
> so you can type
>
> use Event::Type qw(io idle);
>
> Or you could do something with import in Event::Watcher.
OK. Agreed. The question is, do we want to remove the require? I
don't care. Uri, do you care?
--
"May the best description of competition prevail."
via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank
