Rocco Caputo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >MSWin32. I have no idea how well (or if) the fork/exec parts work, >though. For that matter, what about SIGCHLD? "Pipe forks" and SIGCHLD can be mad to work with ITHREADS pseudo-fork(). -- Nick Ing-Simmons
- select()/poll() on Win32: possible funding, but is it in... barries
- Re: select()/poll() on Win32: possible funding, but... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: select()/poll() on Win32: possible funding,... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: select()/poll() on Win32: possible funding, but... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: select()/poll() on Win32: possible funding,... barries
- Re: select()/poll() on Win32: possible fund... Uri Guttman
- Re: select()/poll() on Win32: possible ... barries
- portable IPC::Run (was: "Re: ... Rocco Caputo
- Re: select()/poll() on Win32: possible fund... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: select()/poll() on Win32: possible ... Sean McCune
- RE: select()/poll() on Win32: possible funding, but... Horsley Tom
- Re: select()/poll() on Win32: possible funding,... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: select()/poll() on Win32: possible funding,... Mark Mielke
- RE: select()/poll() on Win32: possible funding, but... Horsley Tom
- RE: select()/poll() on Win32: possible funding, but... Horsley Tom
