Damien Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:06:32AM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> well, it still is incorrect coding. there is no defined meaning for
>> deleting the callback before you have stopped the watcher. why did you
>> even try that? it makes no sense.
>
>From the manpage:
>
> Watchers are stopped implicitly if their new
> configuration deprives them of the ability to generate
> events.
Yes, it's a bug. i am a few weeks away from
having a proper computer lab set up here where
i am staying in India. So maybe i can resume some
maintanance responsibility for Event soon.
Best wishes,
-j
_____________________________________________________________
Thank you for choosing LinuxQuestions.
http://www.linuxquestions.org
