On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:38:19PM +0100, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > Roca Carrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Hi, > > > >BS2000/POSIX-BC platforms use the OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1 character set which > >differs from the IBM's MVS Code Page 1047. > >UTF-EBCDIC is based on Code Page 1047 > > Not exactly. UTF-EBCDIC _Must_ use tr16 translation table or resulting code > is not UTF-EBCDIC as defined by the report but some "other" rendering > of Unicode of your own devising. > > This may mean that which chars are "invariant" are different for other EBCDIC > pages though, but that does not seem to be what your patch is affecting. > > I think the patch is wrong.
Uhh, okay. So retracting the patch... Ignasi, could you show a minimal example of a "Malformed" test? And what does for example this show? ../perl -Ilib -MDevel::Peek -e 'Dump(chr(256))' > -- > Nick Ing-Simmons > http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/ -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
