On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 12:02:18 +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> First of all, Sadahiro, I am very grateful for your excellent > work in fixing these Unicode in EBCDIC cases. Secondly I am > very sorry for not thinking of disabling the IS_UTF8_CHAR() > (which I recently introduced) in EBCDIC. > > Thirdly, are we getting close to a set of patches that Rafael > Garcia-Suarez could integrate to 5.9.x, and Nicholas Clark from > there backport to 5.8.x? I must admit that I am a bit lost in > the jungle of the different patches... I should have explained the relation between the patches on the previous mails. Now I will explain it. The patch on my 1st mail (perl5-porters:105197 or perl-mvs:1389) on this thread will change only utf8.h. This one is superseded by the patch on the my 2nd mail (perl5-porters:105211 or perl-mvs:1391), http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2005-10/msg00016.html The 2nd patch will change utf8.c and utf8.h. Today I have investigated on behaviors of is_utf8_char(), is_utf8_string(), is_utf8_string_loc(), and is_utf8_string_loclen() on EBCDIC platform, and now I think that we need only 2nd patch. Regards, SADAHIRO Tomoyuki
