On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 04:24:51PM +0200, Tels wrote: > Pod::Coverage 0.06 is still falsely reporting the overload thingies as > naked - that should not happen per default since these subs do neither > exist from the authors nor the users point of view. I finally got a chance to read overload.pm and now I actually grok the problem. In 0.07 you'll find Pod::Coverage::Overloader, which has a clue about this stuff, and should act more accordingly. 0.07 also introduces our own version of CvGV[0], since the Devel::Peek on CPAN doesn't have one. This now means that all those people using 5.005_03 can play along too. Oh and extra bugfixes, and tests, and a free pony[1] http://unixbeard.net/~richardc/lab/Pod-Coverage/Pod-Coverage-0.07.tar.gz and CPAN, later. > PS: I see that Math::BigInt has a pood pod coverage. Well, I always > (wrongly?) assumed having code-examples counts as enough doc *cough* ;) Well yes, but code examples aren't terribly easy to parse. Plus there are still a few other styles of documentation to catch, some trickier than others. An example is the style used in Time::Object, which should be pretty close to 100%, but is reported as 0. [0] based on code contributed by Robin Houston, who saved me a *lot* of thinking(tm) [1] except where void -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> god damn, even superman shot himself
