Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: > >> Any particularly good reason we're showing all that "PERL_DL_NONLAZY" >> noise as part of "make test"? What about just: > > I do some weird stuff with that piece to pass data around to my tests. > Sometimes its useful to see it. How about only showing it if TEST_VERBOSE > is true? I agree, MakeMaker is an opaque enough process already, it won't necessarily help to silence it when it's trying to tell you what it's doing. TEST_VERBOSE should show the info if it goes away in the default case. -Ken
- Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Michael G Schwern
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Michael G Schwern
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jab... H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Tels
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Dave Rolsky
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Ken Williams
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Michael G Schwern
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jab... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Michael G Schwern
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Tels
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Ken Williams
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Dave Rolsky
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Tels
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber H . Merijn Brand