On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:21:55PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 08:05:28PM -0700, chromatic wrote: > > Here's tests for ExtUtils::MM_Cygwin. They're skipped on all platforms where > > $^O does not match /cygwin/i. The tests out to pass just about everywhere > > anyway. > > > > It would be good for someone with Cygwin to test them, though. > > Isn't it a bad idea to skip everything on non-Cygwin? > I don't have Cygwin, and I'd quite like the (false) security of seeing > the Cygwin tests pass on my local machine, in the hope that this would mean > that my made-on-unix changes won't break things on Cygwin.
ExtUtils::MM_Cygwin does not have to work on anything but Cygwin, same way that we don't expect ExtUtils:MM_Unix to work on Cygwin. If it did, we wouldn't need MM_Cygwin. If you really want to try them out, you can always just plop C<$^O = 'cygwin'> at the top of your local copy of the test and watch the pretty explosions. -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One Any sufficiently encapsulated hack is no longer a hack.