In perl.qa, you wrote: >On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:10:33PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote: >> Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Debian has the beginnings of that. perl-base is the minimum necessary >> > to have a useful Perl, basically a binary, the perl man page, and a >> > handful of critical modules ... >> >> Wouldn't it be a good idea to try to define packages like these, so >> that packagers can all make consistent packages? > >Come again?
I think he's trying to say that Perl (i.e. the "Perl community") should define these things so that different packagers (Debian, Red Hat, whoever) can have somewhat-consistent packages. K. -- Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/ If it's not broken, break it.
