On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 04:00:34PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 04:52:13 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael G > Schwern) wrote: > > > isa_ok() > > Handles unblessed refs now -> isa_ok([], 'ARRAY'); > > > > Better diagnostics. > > not ok 1 - The object isa Bar > > # Failed test (-e at line 1) > > # The object isn't a 'Bar' its a 'Foo' > > Is that real copy-n-paste from some sample output? > > If so, please replace q(its) with q(it's) in the code. (And I'd also add > a comma or a semicolon after the 'Bar': "The objects isn't a 'Bar'; it's > a 'Foo'" or the like.)
I can never keep it straight when to put an apostrophe on /it'?s/, so as a long-time user of English (almost 24 years now) I've decided to alter my implementation of the language and drop the apostrophe entirely. 'its' is now polymorphic as far as I'm concerned. The Apostrophilic Jihad could submit a patch after meditating on this: http://www.angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One Let me check my notes. http://www.sluggy.com
