On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 05:48:11PM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> I haven't seen any responses to my responses to the RFC. Is this list working?
I'll look for your responses and respond if I have anything to say.
:-)
> P.S. Why is this perl-qa? Shouldn't it be perl6-qa?
I believe Schwern has already answered that ...
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 06:35:01AM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 08:58:05PM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> > Until the language and its edge cases are locked down, any JAPH you collect
> > now may be invalidated.
>
> Yep, we'll have to wait for perl6 JAPHs to start appearing to test
> perl6. However, they'll be useful for testing the perl6->perl5
> translation stuff that's planned.
>
> But you'll note this is perl-qa, not perl6-qa. We're not waiting for
> perl6, we want to use this on perl5. Now. Yinz'll just have to catch
> up.
-Scott
--
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
