Re: RFC: Automated Testing Of Code Examples In Documentation and "=for example"

[Barrie Slaymaker]

Michael G Schwern wrote:
> 
> tchrist makes a
> good point, we can't make it anyting but easy to write POD.

I think the =also tag approach does that pretty well, but I'm not
hearing anyone else say yay/nay on it.

Whether the examples get converted to tests could be flagged in
POD at the top of the file, or by using slightly different syntaxs:

=also_for lint

=also_for test foo.t

instead of

=also_for example

So, is it crazy?  Too complex?  Or just BOOOOOoooooring?

- Barrie