On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 04:50:34PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> While perl6 has not yet defined what an "RFC" really is, what it
> should say or what format it should be in, we can't wait. So I'm
> going forward with a fistful of things I'm calling RFCs. They are
Just for the record, I love your suggestions.
You may want to think about psychology and wording, though. If
someone writes a code patch but does not supply tests/docs, and he or
she is told that the patch is rejected because of that deficiency, he
or she might not submit patches ever again. Writing good test cases
is much harder than the actual fixing itself, but we still should
give positive feedback to the fixer for his or her efforts.
> simply sane, thought out requests for comments which should give us of
> a core to wrap our branes around.
>
> Good enough for now.
>
> --
>
> Michael G Schwern http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Just Another Stupid Consultant Perl6 Kwalitee Ashuranse
> BOFH excuse #169:
>
> broadcast packets on wrong frequency
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
