On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:12:36AM -0400, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> I'm glad you're looking out for Kwalitee, and I have observation about
> the RFC's you've offered. None of them have milestones or completion
> states.
You're right, I've totally forgotten about time! Perhaps its because
I'm kinda on vacation at the moment. I've been waiting to organize a
TODO list until Ask gets me a CVS repository.
> I'd like to suggest that you propose a process for dealing with QC
> initiatives that's distinct from the Working Group/RFC process we're
> inventing.
Why distinct?
BTW Does QA need QA? Should there be a formal way to make sure that
QA is doing its job?
--
Michael G Schwern http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just Another Stupid Consultant Perl6 Kwalitee Ashuranse
Plus I remember being impressed with Ada because you could write an
infinite loop without a faked up condition. The idea being that in Ada
the typical infinite loop would be normally be terminated by detonation.
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
