In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael G Schwern writes: :On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 11:43:36AM +0100, Hugo wrote: :> :This issue is big enough to warrent a seperate discussion/RFC. :> :> Agreed. When that comes, I'll argue that it is perfectly acceptable :> to release a "stable (maintenance) Perl" with known test failures. : :That was actually a subtle hint that YOU might want to write an RFC on it. ;) Oh, ah, maybe. Not through this golddarned 25x80 W*nd*ws Telnet w*nd*w, though. Hugo
- Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch Hugo
- Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch Hugo
- Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch Jonathan Scott Duff
- Hugo