>>>>> "MGS" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MGS> On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 06:27:03PM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: >> >Everyone will have their own pet-peeve category of warnings, but I >> >think keepking uninitialized value warnings off by default will make >> >many people happy. >> >> Not this people. Makes no sense in a default. MGS> Could you expand on that? I don't know Tom's reason. But it is one of the primary indicators of badly handled data. What I think might be more interesting or useful would be to have another undef type. Call it uninit. THis would be only used for data that hasn't been initialized. Then there would be two warnings one for unitialized and one for using undef. It might be better done by doing some kind of dataflow, but that is tricky. <chaim> -- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
- Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default for all no... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Piers Cawley
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Bart Lateur
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Piers Cawley
- Re: Pre-RFC - "use warnings" by default f... Piers Cawley