On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 11:28:25PM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 07:27:10PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Same here. But you have to edit the number of tests anyway, and I think
> you _should_ have to.
What's the benefit of maintaining a count? Perl's a lot better at it
than I am. Almost all of my test suites of late look vaguely like:
use Test ;
my @tests = (
sub {
ok( "rock", "rock" ) ;
},
sub {
ok( "paper", "paper" ) ;
},
sub {
ok( "scissors", "scissors" ) ;
},
) ;
plan tests => scalar @tests ;
$_->() for @tests ;
I use the facet that Test prints our the line number of failing tests to
find what I broke. Sheer bliss. No, really ;-).
I've been very tempted to add in a todo(), that's like ok() but expects
a negative result. I don't see any reason to have to predeclare the
todo list (I mean it's ok wtih me if people want to, I just hate
counting up tests).
- Barrie
