On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:24:06PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The other option is code instrumentation, but that requires parsing of
> > the code. Could be done I suppose, but I wouldn't really want to.
>
> I now drag Simon Cozens into the conversation to talk about his
> rumored Perl parser. Simon?
Depends what sort of instrumentation you want. If you want instrumentation
about how perl sees the code, you probably want my "mangle" patch. If you want
instrumentation which can be produced by a Perl program, see
http://perltidy.sourceforge.net/
I'll be turning perltidy into a Parse::Perl module (with Damian's help) when
the next supply of tuits arrvies. This may be August. :)
--
Pretty, smart, sane: Pick two.
- Ron Echeverri
