On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 03:48:31PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 11:59:24PM -0500, barries wrote:
> > >     todo({ $obj->fooble == 42 });

misread the == as a => for some reason, sorry.  I'm home with a couple
of rambunctious tots today, interruptions & distractions abound :-).

> Okay, we'll file this discussion under YMMV.

That's my point.  Your style isn't the only one out here.

> > > I realized a few months ago that even if I do
> > > patch MakeMaker do to something cool, I can't rely on it because my
> > > code has to work on older installations.
> > 
> > What about providing a module that wraps both Pod::Tests and
> > Test::Harness, scans the command line and tests any specified modules?
> 
> Well, same problem with a MakeMaker patch-- everyone will have to have
> that module.

That's no more a burden than requiring them to have Pod::Tests in the
first place.

> > If no command line arguments, then all files under lib that contain
> > the string /^\s*use selftest\b/ would be tested.
> 
> Ok, let's see a prototype.

When I get time, unless somebody else feels so motivated.

- Barrie

Reply via email to