On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:47:12 +0100, Johan Vromans wrote: >As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name. You guys (=plural) are nuts. So much bickering over such a tiny irrelevant detail. But anyway, if you want a clear and explicit name, why not "smoketesters". Nothing to do with tobacco. Electronics, yes. Or, if you're unlucky, former electronics. -- Bart.
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... schwern
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... David Grove
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... H . Merijn Brand
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... Jonathan Atzger
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... Jonathan Atzger
- RE: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... Fabio
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... Vadim Konovalov
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... Uri Guttman
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... abigail
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... Bart Lateur
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... John Porter
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... David Grove
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's d... schwern