[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> I was poking around on CPAN and noticed this rather complete
>> alternative to Pod::Tests for embedding tests in code, a bit closer to
>> what Barrie was discussing.
>>
>> I've invited the author onto the list and hopefully he'll say a few
>> words. I'd also like people to poke around with it, see what its all
>> about.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've been playing with the Test::Unit::TestCase framework and it's
> potentially very cool, and nicely designed at the macro level.
> However, there's some nastiness in the code itself which could be an
> awful lot more perlish. The fact that the test suite that comes with
> it doesn't actually test the whole system very well is kind of
> annoying too.
I agree. You are invited! Join the PerlUnit folks on sourceforge.
Sorry for not testing everything. We are working on that.
(Hope you did not play with version 0.12 ... :-( ...).
> The documentation is kind of sucky too. It points you at the JUnit
> documentation, then proceeds to do some stuff that JUnit doesn't do...
Well, you have to strike a balance somewhere. And nobody seemed
to like writing documentation, anyway. Maybe we have more, soon.
I agree that on the whole, the framework is not very "perlish".
But I don't know if this is a big problem compared to the gain
that you have reusing the XUnit framework.
Cheers,
Christian Lemburg
