On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 07:45:29AM -0500, barries wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 02:57:42AM +0000, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:56:37AM -0500, barries wrote:
> > > You may want to settle on using underscores everywhere or nowhere in the
> > > interests of consistency.
> >
> > Yeah. Underscores read better but type slower. Hmmm...
>
> Looking up inconsistent ids is slowest :-). I don't find the extra char
> '_' causes noticable impact. I optimize for maintainability and put in
> '_'. YMMV a lot, though.
I know it's religious, but since this is Perl for testing Perl, and will
be in the standard distribution (I suppose), we should probably stick as
close as possible to what's in man perlstyle.
--
Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pjcj.net
