On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 01:57:01AM +0100, Richard Clamp wrote:
> Tony, can you give me feedback on if 0.06 is now more like what you
> hacked 0.02 into, or does it still need that separate _load_code
> interface?
I think it does. Perhaps, I haven't quite delved deeply enough, but the
issue I faced previous is that Devel::Symdump requires a package name
in the Foo::Bar syntax, but doing a require() on that will fail if the
package isn't actually installed yet.
The other way to look at this is that loading the code is a very distinct
activity from parsing it, so should be in a distinct method. Never
make methods do too much, especially when you're expecting people to
subclass.
Tony
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Bowden | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.tmtm.com/
the woods are lovely, dark, and deep, but I have promises to keep
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
