[Quoting Michael G Schwern, on October 8 2001, 14:46, in "Re: Test::Harness in"] > On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 10:20:20AM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote: > > But I agree with everyone who says there should be a better, more > > generic solution. > > Debian. ;)
Actually, I was more thinking in terms of delivering perl not in one single rpm, but to have one rpm for barebones perl, and rpms for each of the individual core modules (or logical sets of core modules). -- Johan
