On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 05:50:45PM +0200, alian wrote:
> After see a smoke report from Nicolas Clark using ccache, I took a look 
> at ccache web site. And find http://build.samba.org.

Oooh, they've got a Cray in theirs.

> So I've begin something like this, thing I would see on http://qa.perl.org:
> http://www.alianwebserver.com/cgi-bin/smoke_db
> 
> Comments are welcome.

Part in English, part in French? :-)

I suppose that I should be thankful that it's not part Finnish, part Tamil.

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:59:21PM +0200, Abe Timmerman wrote:
> Op een mooie herfstdag (Monday 23 September 2002 16:14), schreef Alain Barbet:
> 
> > Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > http://www.alianwebserver.com/cgi-bin/smoke_db
> >
> >  > Looks great!  Some suggestions/questions:
> >  > - freebsd os version missing?
> >
> > Yes it's missing info from Nicolas Clark reports.
> 
> That is due to the combination of 1.13 and changed Config.pm (should be solved 
> in 1.15).

And as I seem to be running 1.06 (with tweaks) this would explain why you're
not seeing it. I'll try to send a patch to merge the tweaks back in, plus
then try to get around to making the changes mentioned at YAPC::EU
(splitting the commands run for make regen_headers out into a script, calling
that script instead of make regen_headers in the smoke harness, and the
option of multiple build trees where copying (or hard link forestry) is
faster than make distclean)

But that's at least number 3 on my todo list (after sorting out the
spoofathon, getting the script for my YAPC::EU talk written down and
online)

> >  > - at least for the linuxes and bsds
> >  >   it would be useful to have also
> >  >   the CPU architecture in the
> >  >   report (not all boxes are x86)

Nor are all Solaris boxes sparc.
(or x86 for that matter - it was internally ported to alpha to check 64 bit
cleanliness before true 64 bit sparc chips were available)

> > k, but this is a missing info from smoke report.
> 
> I can add $Config{archname} to the smokereports if you all want that.

That would be good.

Nicholas Clark

Reply via email to