> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:03 PM
> To: Potozniak, Andrew
> Cc: 'chromatic'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: thinking about variable context for like()
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:23:19PM -0500, Potozniak, Andrew wrote:
> > Is anyone going to develop this, or is all of this just
> > wishfull/theorhetical thinking?
>
> Boy, that sounds like a volunteer if I ever heard one!
>
> Anyhow, it looks like Test::LongString is what you want. Now
> say thank you to Rafael. :)
Uh.....thank you Rafael! Anyway I was just giving my two cents on a
possible implementation to see what the "general" perl-qa community thought
about it.
>
>
> > If someone will develop this are we going to add it to Test::More
>
> What's this "we" stuff, bub? :)
>
> No new functions are going into Test::More. The interface is
> pretty much
> done. This is ok because...
>
>
> > or create a module wrapped around Test::More with the added
> > functionality?
>
> ...you don't write wrappers around Test::More. You use the
> same underlying class Test::More does: Test::Builder. This
> includes, oddly enough, like()!
>
>
> --
> Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
> Do not try comedy at home!
> Milk & Cheese are advanced experts! Attempts at comedy can
> be dangerously unfunny!
>
