Re: ok(1,1) vs. ok ('foo','foo') in Test::More

[Fergal Daly]

On Tuesday 03 February 2004 20:46, Tels wrote:
> PS: Thanx for your suggestion, but what exactly does this do:
> 
> sub ok
> {
>         @_ = 1;
>         goto &Test::More::ok;
> }
> 
> Pass a single (1), or only the first argument? *puzzled*

It passes a single (1) :-( It should be

$#_ = 0;

I got too used to use @array as a scalar, I forgot that doesn't work for 
setting,

F