Op een zonnige zomerdag (Monday 02 August 2004 01:25), schreef Jim Cromie:
> for various reasons, it would be nice to have a newsgroup,
> ex this one (perl.test, but sending failed), or perhaps
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], that gets full-reports for smoke-tests when
> something breaks.
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.daily-build.reports
(aka [EMAIL PROTECTED])
We discuss the Test::Smoke software on daily-build (aka [EMAIL PROTECTED])
...
> This would save smokers from the hassle of rerunning tests to
> supply a would-be fixer with the full info, as the report would already
> be 'out there'.
Are you suggesting we should change the smoke-reports? Any input is always
welcome. Please discuss on the smokers list (most p5-porters also read it).
Good luck,
Abe
--
Well, dereferencing that (as CvGV() would do) leads nowhere. Or, as
the Ten Commandments for C Programmers quoth, "Thou shalt not follow
the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end."
-- Jarkko Hietaniemi on p5p @ 2002-05-14
