On Tue 07 Dec 2004 05:28, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think even better than > > ok( $expr, "name" ); > > or > > ok( $expr, "comment" ); > > is > > ok( $expr, "label" );
or ok ($expr, "indicator"); or ok ($expr, "tag"); for me the name/comment/label/tag/indicator/... is just a tag (which does not have to be unique) to be able to find back my test in the test script. As long as all tests run fine, you don't read them, so "tag" sounds best to me > RJBS points out that "comment" implies "not really worth doing", and I > still don't like "name" because it implies (to me) a unique identifier. > We also talked about "description", but "description" is just soooo > overloaded. -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.5, & 5.9.x, and 809 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, 11i, AIX 4.3, AIX 5.2, SuSE 9.1, and Win2k. http://www.cmve.net/~merijn/ http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] send smoke reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], QA: http://qa.perl.org
