Michael G Schwern wrote:
I just went to go patch in the code ref stuff to is_deeply() and found that
I had unfinished changes to the diagnostic output. Remember, it was about
including the description in the failure diagnostics. So instead of this:
/Users/schwern/tmp/test...NOK 1
# Failed test (/Users/schwern/tmp/test at line 5)
# got: '42'
# expected: '23'
You get this:
/Users/schwern/tmp/test...NOK 1
# Failed test "this is the test description"
# in /Users/schwern/tmp/test at line 5
# got: '42'
# expected: '23'
There was some debate about the details, I don't remember how it all turned
out but I like this new format. Any objections before I chuck it in?
I ranted a while back about s/got/received/
David
