On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 03:52 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 01:45:11PM +0300, George Nistorica wrote:
> > My guess is that you could add a comment here:
> > http://gauss.ffii.org/PatentView/EP1170667/Comments?action=edit&backto=PatentView/EP1170667
> > and express your point of view.
> >
> > I hope this patent will not be granted ...
>
> Its already been granted.
Indeed, but still, it can be revoked by EPO. That's what I'm hoping,
that it will be revoked.
>
>
--
#!/usr/bin/perl -w ###################
use strict;###########################
( $_ = qq{0912 3c1217 709073043p2it//,
'"70kc1H 270P 70htonA t3uJ" tni7p'8;})
=~ tr/42179038/(larves)/;eval#uate;
######################################
