On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 02:56:53PM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote:
> >Calling builder() is safer than Test::Builder->new as it is forward
> >compatible for a day when each module will be able to have its own
> >Test::Builder object rather than the strict singleton it is now.
> [snip]
>
> In that case should we be encouraging people to write
>
> sub ok ($;$) {
> Test::Simple->builder->ok(@_);
> }
>
> instead of using a package lexical, in case people want to swap
> modules at runtime?
Yep, I was thinking about just that this morning... err, afternoon.
--
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
Don't try the paranormal until you know what's normal.
-- "Lords and Ladies" by Terry Prachett
