On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 09:12 -0400, Christopher H. Laco wrote: > I really don't get why the people (not specifically you) who don't agree > with, don't care for, don't care about CPANTs or more CPANTS tests spend > all this effort going off on why it's such a bad thing and why it > shouldn't be done.
I care because *some* of the metrics don't completely suck. It'd be nice to get rid of (or improve) the useless ones while failing to add metrics such as "Uses no hard tabs anywhere in the distribution", "Uses BSD style formatting", "Has twice as much documentation as code", "Has no subroutine over 20 lines in length", "Uses good variable names", "Doesn't reinvent the wheel", and "Runs test coverage automatically using Acme::Test::Coverage::Everyone::Everywhere". -- c
