On Nov 2, 2005, at 12:13 PM, David Landgren wrote:
No. I'm complaining that there's no need for two different Kwalitee
points for this, that's all. I think one is sufficient (and a very
worthy one I should add, in case I wasn't being clear, which I
probably wasn't).
Ahh, that was unclear from your message. I thought you were
protesting the addition of a new Kwalitee test in general, hence my
annoyance. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
I originally advocated for one of the two methods of determining the
license, not necessarily for both.
Chris
P.S. On a marginally-related note, I released
Module::License::Report yesterday. Unfortunately, it's not
immediately useful for Kwalitee because it eval()s code from
Makefile.PL and/or Build.PL, and makes use of
Module::Depends::Intrusive which does more of the same.
--
Chris Dolan, Software Developer, Clotho Advanced Media Inc.
608-294-7900, fax 294-7025, 1435 E Main St, Madison WI 53703
Clotho Advanced Media, Inc. - Creators of MediaLandscape Software
(http://www.media-landscape.com/) and partners in the revolutionary
Croquet project (http://www.opencroquet.org/)
