Moin, On Monday 20 February 2006 04:20, Adam Kennedy wrote: > (Andreas J. Koenig) wrote: > >>>>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:22:20 +1100, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>> said: > > > > > > 1. Broken or corrupt packaging. > > > A bad tarball, MANIFEST files missing. > > > > Make sure you verify that all files in the distro are readable. > > Reject if the permissions are bogus. Recently we had an increasig > > number of distros that had absurd permissions. > > That's a 1. > > > Also there is the rule that it must unpack into a single top level > > directory and must not clobber the working directory. > > That's a 2. > > > Besides that, we reject distros that contain a blib/ directory. This > > seems arbitrary usually just catches a trivial error that might cause > > grief later. > > That one's more interesting... the packaging itself is ok, and > technically it's a valid "perl5", "perl5.make" or "perl5.build" > package, but it has failed something more like a compulsory consistency > check... > > So maybe 3. Package failed compulsory quality check
Can you do warnings as well?
Warn if any of these is missing:
SIGNATURE
META.yml
Makefile.PL
?
If the SIGNATURE is there, but fails to check, then reject outright.
Best wishes,
Tels
--
Signed on Mon Feb 20 12:29:40 2006 with key 0x93B84C15.
Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/
PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.
"My glasses, my glasses. I cannot see without my glasses." - "My
glasses, my glasses. I cannot be seen without my glasses."
pgpjcG7ZOo9VW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
