On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 23:04:02 +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote: > > >Even better would be adding two more states so that you can > >distinguish between prereq-failure, build-failure, test-failure and > >ok. > > Well actually I tried to sit down the other day and work out how many > distinct types of success/failure events there might be, for use in PITA. > > The number came out to something like 15 :) > > Which I imagine means we end up with something like a HTTP numbering system.
no no! just use strings: ok build_failure test_failure prereq_failure etc etc. Human *AND* machine readable. -- () Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0xEBD27418 perl hacker & /\ kung foo master: *shu*rik*en*sh*u*rik*en*s*hur*i*ke*n*: neeyah!!!!
pgpt28wRHpt4p.pgp
Description: PGP signature