On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 23:04:02 +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> 
> >Even better would be adding two more states so that you can
> >distinguish between prereq-failure, build-failure, test-failure and
> >ok.
> 
> Well actually I tried to sit down the other day and work out how many 
> distinct types of success/failure events there might be, for use in PITA.
> 
> The number came out to something like 15 :)
> 
> Which I imagine means we end up with something like a HTTP numbering system.

no no! just use strings:

        ok
        build_failure
        test_failure
        prereq_failure
        
etc etc.

Human *AND* machine readable.


-- 
 ()  Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0xEBD27418  perl hacker &
 /\  kung foo master: *shu*rik*en*sh*u*rik*en*s*hur*i*ke*n*: neeyah!!!!

Attachment: pgpt28wRHpt4p.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to