Moin, On Saturday 01 April 2006 14:13, demerphq wrote: > On 4/1/06, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/1/06, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Similarly > > > > > > > > if somebody has an error in their Build.PL or Makefile.PL are you > > > > going to say that the "installer" doesnt work? > > > > > > Yes, absolutely. > > > > So you would file a bug with ExtUtils::MakeMaker or Module::Build > > when the pre-build script that accompanies a script has a syntax > > error in it? > > > > Lets hope you wouldnt be surprised when they file said bug report in > > /dev/nul.... > > That was meant to have a smiley face after it. > > :-) > > Seriously tho, how can such a situation be the installers fault?
Easy, Makefile.PL, M::B or whatever are all parts of the install process. It's just that different parties are responsibe for different parts. (Just think how my Makefile.PLs broke because there was a change in YAML.) You just complain to the person most likely to fix the problem. Best wishes, Tels -- Signed on Sat Apr 1 18:28:01 2006 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. "A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk I have a work station." -- Unknown
pgpNvEPmgLB70.pgp
Description: PGP signature
