chromatic wrote:
On Sunday 23 April 2006 15:46, Michael Peters wrote:
How about a good TAP parser module that does nothing but parse TAP. Then
it could be used in all kinds of test harness permutations.
That's exactly what I want and precisely why I think a well-defined TAP is
more important than a plugin system for any particular harness.
Hear hear. Personally, I don't even WANT the harness output, or even the
harness (or at least, the result tracking functionality), I just want to
run the tests, capture the TAP and then deal with it on an as-needed
basis elsewhere.
Adam K
