On 19/07/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 06:03, demerphq wrote:> Excuse me? Where did I say the code was "broken"? Wasn't that the implication when you said you've seen misleading line numbers many times? > use Test::More tests => 3; > > sub my_ok { > ok($_[0],$_[1]); > } I don't know why you'd expect this to report the right line numbers; this code really *is* broken.
What's wrong with that code? It doesn't do anything useful right now but you can't argue that a system that stops being useful when you use subroutines is good. If Test::Builder gave a stack trace rather than a single line number then this wouldn't be broken, F
